Erik Coon represents clients in construction law and litigation matters, particularly in government contract bid protests, claims, and other procurement issues. Working within the federal jurisdiction, Erik advises contractors, subcontractors, construction managers, architects, and engineers located throughout the United States.
His practice places him at the crossroads of business and government – a position where his experience and knowledge base serve his clients well. Erik has gained a deep understanding of the crucial role that government contracts play in the financial health of many companies; some would likely face insolvency or bankruptcy if they failed to win a particular contract or if they lost a bid protest. Making it a priority to closely monitor the ever-evolving regulatory framework that governs the government contracts arena, he always stays abreast of trends and developments in the procurement field.
Before joining Bradley, Erik was a government contracts attorney at another nationally recognized construction firm. He has worked on claims before the ASBCA, CBCA, COFC, as well as more than 25 bid protests before the GAO.
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America: Ones to Watch Construction Law, 2025-2026 Litigation - Construction, 2026 Listed in Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers, "Rising Stars,” Government Contracts, 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, 2022, 2025 Landscape Management System, Inc., B-423523.5, B-423523.6 (2026) Successfully represented the intervenor-awardee, NOREAS, Inc., in a GAO bid protest involving a contract awarded by the Navy’s Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) for hazardous waste services in Guam. Arcadis Pond JV, B-423372; B-423373 (2025) Successfully represented the protester in a GAO protest challenge of the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) decision to exclude Arcadis Pond JV from further consideration under solicitations No. W912GB24R0018 and W912GB24R0020 for various military construction projects in Europe. The USACE took voluntary corrective action by “reinstating Arcadis Pond JV in the price negotiation phase of these acquisitions.” MAG DS Corporation- dba MAG Aerospace, B-423820 (2025) Successfully represented the protester in a GAO protest challenge to the Department of the Army, U.S. Army Materiel Command evaluation of proposals and resulting award decision in a contract for systems engineering and technical assistance support services for Program Executive Office Soldier. The Army took voluntary corrective action as a result of the protest. CIMA JV; G-W Management Services, LLC; Tidewater-PEM JV LLC, B-422813, et al. (2024) Successfully represented the intervenor-awardee, Edifice Services JV, LLC, in a GAO bid protest involving a contract awarded by the Navy’s Naval Facilities Engineering Systems Command (NAVFAC) for construction services within the NAVFAC Washington area of responsibility. G-W Management Services, LLC, B-421886, et al. (2023) Successfully represented the intervenor-awardee, Encon Desbuild JV3, LLC, in a GAO bid protest involving a contract awarded by the Navy, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, for construction services at the Marine Corps base in Quantico, Virginia. Facility Services Management, Inc., B-420102.3 (2022) Successfully represented the intervenor-awardee, Valiant Government Services, LLC, in a GAO bid protest involving a task order issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for operation and maintenance services supporting medical facilities at Travis Air Force Base, California. Kiewit Infrastructure West Company, B-419687, B-419687.2 (2021) Successfully represented the intervenor-awardee, Hensel Phelps Construction Company, in a GAO bid protest involving a task order contract awarded by the Department of the Navy for repair, design, and conversion of existing facilities into administrative facilities in Oahu, Hawaii. Markit! Forestry Management, LLC—Costs, B-417910.3 (2020) Successfully represented the protester in a request for reimbursement of reasonable costs of filing and pursuing a protest when the Forest Service unduly delayed taking corrective action in the face of a clearly meritorious protest.
