Joann Johnson v. Delta Health Alliance, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-00173-SA-JMV (N.D. Miss. 2024)
Represented Delta Health Alliance, Inc. in an age-discrimination suit under the ADEA. Early in discovery, persuaded opposing counsel to recommend settlement, resulting in a prompt and favorable resolution for the client.
Rebecca Drury v. Versar National Security Solutions LLC, et al., No. 1:23-cv-00373-LG-RPM (S.D. Miss. 2024)
Defended Versar National Security Solutions LLC against sex and age discrimination claims under Title VII and the ADEA. After the defense filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action, resolving the case without the need for further litigation or discovery.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Teresa Thomson Albright, et al., No. 3:24-cv-00050-MPM-RP (N.D. Miss. 2024)
Represented a life insurer in an ERISA-governed interpleader action involving competing claims to life-insurance benefits. Obtained a consent judgment that resolved competing claims, barred future disputes, and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Alice Harris v. Jackson HMA, LLC d/b/a Merit Health Central, et al., No. 3:23-cv-03140-HTW-LGI (S.D. Miss. 2025)
Defended Merit Health Central against claims of race discrimination, age discrimination, retaliation, and related tort claims. Secured dismissal of the action after moving to dismiss based on the plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.
LaKendra Scaife v. Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation, et al., No. 4:24-cv-00011-JM (E.D. Ark. 2025)
Successfully defended CHSPSC, LLC and Utilization Review Services, LLC against race-discrimination and retaliation claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The plaintiff’s discrimination claim was premised on seven alleged adverse employment actions, and the court granted summary judgment on all claims after finding no genuine dispute of material fact.
Matthew Warren Bright v. The Medical Center Navicent Health, No. 5:23-cv-447 (M.D. Ga. 2025)
Represented Navicent Health in a Title VII action alleging disparate treatment, disparate impact, and retaliation relating to the hospital’s grooming policy. Secured summary judgment dismissing all claims.